umop ap!sdn wrote:And somehow I doubt DS' word was "fuck".
Llance, you're one tricky devil!
Lance wrote:Dragon Star wrote:Fuck you Lance!
Smart bastard... :P
I actually made sure to PM St. Jimmy to tell him not to take my "fuck off" comment seriously, and to let him know what I was up to. ;)
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:'Tis better to be a smart ass than a dumb ass. . .
Lance wrote:umop ap!sdn wrote:And somehow I doubt DS' word was "fuck".
Llance, you're one tricky devil!
<humble bow>
Lance wrote:umop ap!sdn wrote:And somehow I doubt DS' word was "fuck".
Llance, you're one tricky devil!
<humble bow>
umop ap!sdn wrote:Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:'Tis better to be a smart ass than a dumb ass. . .
I heard it was better than being a dumb shit. :D
hippietrekx wrote:They're the same words, KOS. The words go with the target, not the assassin.
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:hippietrekx wrote:They're the same words, KOS. The words go with the target, not the assassin.
OK, so here's the rather interesting situation that could arise. Suppose X is a master assassin, and has a target of Y. Y is not so good, but has a target of Z. Since Y is not so good, Z is able to guess one of the kill words. Z now has a choice. S/he can counter-assassinate immediately, and take Y out. Or Z can calculate that Y isn't very good at this game, and will bite the dust eventually anyway, and stay silent. X being a master assassin (of course, Z does not know that X is after Y) quickly knocks off Y. Z can then promptly counter-assassinate X, even if X attempts to get Z to say the kill word in a very skillful/subtle way, perhaps even a different kill word than the one Y gave away.
Do I interpret the rules correctly?
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:OK, so here's the rather interesting situation that could arise.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests