by Lance » Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:00 pm
The term "clairvoyance" is pretty vague, but I think an automated test like this is unfaithful to the original.
By eliminating the "sender", you remove one of the means by which the person being tested could have sensed the answers. And that is the sensory method I find to be most plausible in the first place.
No trees were killed in the posting of this message.
However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
==========================================
Build a man a fire and he will be warm for a few hours.
Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
