Page 3 of 6
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:51 pmby Heid the Ba
No, he does look a lot like Yeltsin. I hadn't noticed before. It is widely assumed the Heath was gay as he never married but he was in power well before homosexuality was accepted, or even legal at the start of his career. I assume we have some openly gay politicians but offhand I can't think of any other than the Tory Leader in Scotland.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Mon Aug 03, 2015 3:32 pmby Мастер
I'd say the fellow on the right looks a lot like Boris Yeltsin.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Mon Aug 03, 2015 5:38 pmby Lance
Ya think?
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Mon Aug 03, 2015 8:35 pmby Enzo
Or a TV evangelist.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Fri Aug 14, 2015 3:00 pmby Heid the Ba
Janner dragged to court today. Whether he is doolally or not his accusers are getting their say.
Meanwhile Sweden says
fuck it, 2010 is too long ago.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Fri Nov 27, 2015 1:13 pmby Heid the Ba
Justice Goddard sets out who she will probe. Churches, politicians, councils and children's homes mainly.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 12, 2016 2:28 pmby Heid the Ba
There is apparently no evidence of a cover up of accusations against Heath/Yeltsin, which means either there was no cover up or there is no evidence of it.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 12, 2016 5:24 pmby tubeswell
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2016 10:09 amby Heid the Ba
A
different super-injunction which shows the stupidity of the law. Short version: Elton John is in an open relationship with his husband. Elton John had a consensual threesome with another couple, which his husband knew about. The other couple went to the papers. Elton John went to the courts and was granted a super-injunction which means the media in England and Wales can't even mention the existence of the injunction, never mind who was granted it. An appeal victory means they can now discuss the existence of the injunction but not name Elton John or give any clues as to Elton John's identity. This rumbles on in the courts despite anyone with even a passing interest knowing it is Elton John and US and Scottish newspapers publishing Elton John's name. The English media can't even say which Scottish newspaper it was, even though that newspaper is sold in hard copy across England. This has now passed the Streisand Effect and reached new levels of stupidity for so many reasons.
Edit for clarity.
P.S. it is Elton John.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2016 10:55 amby Lianachan
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2016 2:16 pmby Lance
This is funny. Prior to this post, I knew nothing of this. Never heard about it at all.
If not for the attempt to cover it up, it is likely I would have never become aware of it.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2016 2:24 pmby Arneb
Hey, neither did I.
BTW, why is anyone interested in where a musician of some note buts his dick, when, and in whose company?
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2016 2:30 pmby Lance
Arneb wrote:BTW, why is anyone interested in where a musician of some note buts his dick, when, and in whose company?
Yeah, really.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2016 2:38 pmby Heid the Ba
I don't care. What bothers me is that the courts pander to the rich by letting them take out injunctions so secret that their existence can't even be hinted at, and cloak this as an attempt to protect his child(ren) rather than an attempt to cover up the quite odd things* he gets up to. Then the courts insist on the injunction staying in place as if the print medium was the only way to disseminate information.
*involving a paddling pool, olive oil, and a short, fat, bald 69 year old. You're welcome.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2016 2:39 pmby Heid the Ba
Lance wrote:This is funny. Prior to this post, I knew nothing of this. Never heard about it at all.
If not for the attempt to cover it up, it is likely I would have never become aware of it.
That would be
The Streisand Effect.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2016 2:50 pmby Arneb
Heid the Ba' wrote:I don't care. What bothers me is that the courts pander to the rich by letting them take out injunctions so secret that their existence can't even be hinted at, and cloak this as an attempt to protect his child(ren) rather than an attempt to cover up the quite odd things* he gets up to. Then the courts insist on the injunction staying in place as if the print medium was the only way to disseminate information.
*involving a paddling pool, olive oil, and a short, fat, bald 69 year old. You're welcome.
I totally get that, and agree. It was just a general remark about how the whole shit wouldn't have started if people weren't interested in what a fat, bald, short 69 yo does with his dick to a bottle of olive oil. Sigh.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2016 3:33 pmby Heid the Ba
Oh, I hear you. It is the abuse of the process that rips my knitting. If I fuck up the papers can publish anything they choose. If Ryan Giggs shags his brother's wife he can take out a super-injunction to stop anyone finding out, simply because he has the money to do so.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2016 3:42 pmby Lianachan
Heid the Ba' wrote:Oh, I hear you. It is the abuse of the process that rips my knitting. If I fuck up the papers can publish anything they choose. If Ryan Giggs shags his brother's wife he can take out a super-injunction to stop anyone finding out, simply because he has the money to do so.
Of course, as indicated above, quite the opposite happens and more people find out than would have without all that fuss.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2016 4:10 pmby Heid the Ba
Lianachan wrote:Heid the Ba' wrote:Oh, I hear you. It is the abuse of the process that rips my knitting. If I fuck up the papers can publish anything they choose. If Ryan Giggs shags his brother's wife he can take out a super-injunction to stop anyone finding out, simply because he has the money to do so.
Of course, as indicated above, quite the opposite happens and more people find out than would have without all that fuss.
Only because the media won their appeal, if they had lost, or not appealed then no-one would ever have known. About Elton John. And a paddling pool full of olive oil.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2016 4:31 pmby Lianachan
The only worthwhile or accurate thing Jeremy Clarkson has ever said:
Injunctions don’t work. You take out an injunction against somebody or some organisation and immediately news of that injunction and the people involved and the story behind the injunction is in a legal-free world on Twitter and the Internet. It’s pointless.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Fri May 20, 2016 1:14 amby Enzo
So I can safely assume then it is not virgin olive oil?
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Fri May 20, 2016 2:01 amby Lance
lol
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Fri May 20, 2016 8:50 amby Heid the Ba
Lianachan wrote:The only worthwhile or accurate thing Jeremy Clarkson has ever said:
Injunctions don’t work. You take out an injunction against somebody or some organisation and immediately news of that injunction and the people involved and the story behind the injunction is in a legal-free world on Twitter and the Internet. It’s pointless.
I hate to agree with Jeremy Clarkson but that is true of injunctions, it is also why we have super-injunctions where there existence rarely comes out.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:27 amby Heid the Ba
Rather than start a new thread:
Smug Tony lied. Oh, and there were no WMDs in Iraq.
Re: Secret trials, kiddiefiddling and non-specific bumfooler
Posted:
Thu Jul 07, 2016 11:04 amby Heid the Ba
Watch on youtube.com