Page 1 of 1

Sudan man forced to 'marry' goat

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:10 pm
by Bill_Thompson
From The BBC
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4748292.stm?lspan

A Sudanese man has been forced to take a goat as his "wife", after he was caught having sex with the animal.
The goat's owner, Mr Alifi, said he surprised the man with his goat and took him to a council of elders.

They ordered the man, Mr Tombe, to pay a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) to Mr Alifi.

"We have given him the goat, and as far as we know they are still together," Mr Alifi said.

Mr Alifi, of Hai Malakal in Upper Nile State, told the Juba Post newspaper that he heard a loud noise around midnight on 13 February and immediately rushed outside to find Mr Tombe with his goat.

"When I asked him: 'What are you doing there?', he fell off the back of the goat, so I captured and tied him up."

Mr Alifi then called elders to decide how to deal with the case.

"They said I should not take him to the police, but rather let him pay a dowry for my goat because he used it as his wife," Mr Alifi told the newspaper.


I guess there is hope for a happy life afterall.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:55 am
by umop ap!sdn
:lol:

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 4:41 am
by Bill_Thompson
pshaw, don't edit my posts just because they are accurate and make a good point.

What it says above is not what I had said.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:02 am
by umop ap!sdn
Oh come on, your post is exactly as you left it.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:04 pm
by Lance
No, I removed a senseless ad hom. It wasn't worth comment.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:13 pm
by Bill_Thompson
umop ap!sdn wrote:Oh come on, your post is exactly as you left it.


No it was way funny. And to a good point. It mentioned that there was hope for happiness for two certain virgins here who seem to lack a direction in their sexual orientation and feel a need to underscore that they hope that they are at least not gay.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:14 pm
by Bill_Thompson
Lance wrote:No, I removed a senseless ad hom. It wasn't worth comment.


Another possibility is that you just don't get it. And by "get it" I mean, "understand it". I don't know exactly what you get or how you get it.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:23 am
by Dragon Star
Bill_Thompson wrote:
umop ap!sdn wrote:Oh come on, your post is exactly as you left it.


No it was way funny. And to a good point. It mentioned that there was hope for happiness for two certain virgins here who seem to lack a direction in their sexual orientation and feel a need to underscore that they hope that they are at least not gay.


I'm gay.

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:07 am
by Bill_Thompson
Dragon Star wrote:
Bill_Thompson wrote:
umop ap!sdn wrote:Oh come on, your post is exactly as you left it.


No it was way funny. And to a good point. It mentioned that there was hope for happiness for two certain virgins here who seem to lack a direction in their sexual orientation and feel a need to underscore that they hope that they are at least not gay.


I'm gay.

And brave.

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:13 am
by Dragon Star
Bill_Thompson wrote:
Dragon Star wrote:
Bill_Thompson wrote:
umop ap!sdn wrote:Oh come on, your post is exactly as you left it.


No it was way funny. And to a good point. It mentioned that there was hope for happiness for two certain virgins here who seem to lack a direction in their sexual orientation and feel a need to underscore that they hope that they are at least not gay.


I'm gay.

And brave.


I try.

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:17 am
by Lonewulf
Dragon Star wrote:I'm gay.


That explains why you were looking at my ass earlier. :?

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:19 am
by Dragon Star
Shut up, you'd let me...